More rare is to think about it in the context of linguistics, psychology, and epistemology to detail the actual mechanism at work here.
I believe that the movie scriptwriter was satirically denouncing the propaganda fueled by the media through tobacco advertisements.
The chapter on language is highly technical and it is one of the strongest in the book. The danger is speech that appears to be reasonable and offers reasonable proposals, but in fact erodes reasonableness. These liberal democratic norms for reasonableness are undermined by language itself, formal semantics and pragmatics and the use of code words.
His argument is not predicated on the assumption that these inequalities are bad, but that they are bad because they create flawed ideology. For instance, I believe that most advertisements related to junk food are non-rational propaganda.
IDEAS: How can propaganda inform and educate people to defend their own interests in a more conscious way?
But even in Rome there was nothing like the non-stop distraction now provided by newspapers and magazines, by radio, television and the cinema [so says Huxley, the old fuddy-duddy]. Both aimed to establish a totalitarian system but their different characters and circumstances in their respective countries resulted in two very different approaches in obtaining their goals.